Best Paper Prize
In 2011 FISS introduced the Best Paper Prize competition. In collaboration with Policy Press, the prize is awarded to the best, previously unpublished paper presented at each year’s FISS conference. The winner receives €300 and the paper is published in the Journal of Poverty & Social Justice. Selection and publication are subject to a refereeing process. In addition, the prize winner will receive a personal subscription to the Journal for 2 years.
The winning paper is selected by members of the FISS Board of Governors who draw up an initial short-list of papers presented at the conference. The authors of the short-listed papers are asked whether they would like to be considered for the prize, and any potential revisions will be discussed at this stage. A deadline for submitting the papers for consideration will then be set, and the final decision will be made by a committee of FISS Governors. The winning paper will be subject to the Journal’s normal peer review processing prior to publication.
The Journal of Poverty and Social Justice is published by Policy Press. For news about the Journal sign up to our mailing lists and follow us on Twitter @JPSJ_Journal.
Previous Prize Winners
Gilbert Montcho, Julien Navaux, Marcel Mérette, "Comparing Public Transfers to Immigrants and Natives in Canada: A National Transfer Accounts Approach"
In Canada, immigration constitutes the primary response to population ageing. While extensive research has covered the impact of immigration on various aspects of labour supply, the financial aspect has received less attention. In this study, we apply the National Transfer Account (NTA) method and demographic decomposition to estimate the net fiscal cost, including social security, of immigration in Canada between 1997 and 2015. Results show that, on average, immigrants received about CAN$1,710 more in net transfer per capita than natives between 1997 and 2015. However, this cost is mainly the result of labour market imbalances which, after removing the effect of demographic differences, account for 85% of the surplus.
Shared prize
Julie Vinck, "Exploring the disability–poverty nexus in children: a cross-national comparative analysis in Europe"
By ratifying the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, states committed themselves to ensure an adequate standard of living and social protection to all persons with disabilities, including children. Yet, prior studies showed that children with disabilities are more likely to grow up poor. Existing research has mainly focused on single-country case studies or comparative analyses for low- and middle-income countries. Due to the lack of good quality data, comparative studies on poverty outcomes, its determinants and the poverty-reducing role of social transfers among children with disabilities in high-income countries are largely missing. This article addresses these gaps using the 2017 EU-SILC cross-sectional survey. The results show great differences across Europe in the prevalence of childhood disability, the poverty outcomes of children with disabilities and the poverty-reducing effectiveness of social transfers for them. In only a third of European countries are children with disabilities more likely to live in poor households than children without disabilities. Countries that perform weakly for children without disabilities also perform weakly for children with disabilities. Moreover, social transfers achieve more for children with disabilities in more than half of European countries. The family’s employment participation and social background have the expected poverty-reducing effects for children with disabilities and children without disabilities, though the strength of some effects differs between the two groups within certain geographical regions. However, the income-based poverty indicator disregards the higher costs families with children with disabilities face which underestimates their poverty risk. More research is needed on which poverty indicator accurately reflects the real living standards of children with disabilities.
https://doi.org/10.1332/17598273Y2023D000000006
Nick Biddle, Matthew Gray, Ben Phillips and David Stanton, "The COVID-19 pandemic: The Australian policy response and outcomes"
During the 2019/20 Australian spring and summer Australia experienced widespread bushfires that were unprecedented and which had substantial negative economic impacts. This was closely followed by the COVID-19 pandemic. In response to the pandemic Australia’s borders were effectively closed, there were widespread restrictions on internal travel and extended periods of lockdown in different areas of Australia.
In response to the economic effects of COVID-19 and the associated restrictions, the Australian government temporarily increased the generosity of many social security payments, reduced or suspended job search requirements for the unemployed, introduced a large-scale “wage subsidy” program designed to keep many workers employed (even if they were working zero hours), and a range of supports for many businesses. There were was also a significant fiscal expansion via government investments in various infrastructure projects.
This paper describes the impact of COVID-19 on labour market outcomes, income and poverty in Australia and the role that the social security system played in mitigating the impacts.. The paper uses data from the ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods COVID-19 impact monitoring survey program which has followed the same group of respondents from prior to the 2019/20 Bushfires, micro-simulation modelling and various official statistics.
The analysis shows that during COVID-19 incomes in Australia increased, particularly towards the bottom of the income distribution. The changes made to the social security system during COVID-19 resulted in household incomes in Australia increasing and have seen by some as a model for the changes that could be made longer-term in order to produce a more socially just and fairer society.
Jane Millar & Peter Whiteford, "Timing it right or timing it wrong: how should income-tested benefits deal with changes in circumstances?"
This article examines the challenges in designing income-tested benefits for people of working age. This is particularly difficult in the context of changing patterns of work and volatility in earnings and income. Matching benefits to needs requires timely assessment and payment. We compare the treatment of timing issues in the working-age welfare systems of the United Kingdom and Australia. The article discusses how these different but similar systems deal with the timing of income receipt and benefit adjustment, problems of overpayment and debt, and draws out some lessons for the design of income-tested provisions.
Zachary Parolin and David Brady, "Extreme child poverty and the role of social policy in the United States"
This paper applies improved household income data to reevaluate the levels, trends, composition, and role of social policy in extreme child poverty in the US from 1997 to 2015. We adjust for benefit underreporting and incorporate the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP). This reduces the share of children below $2 per day from 1.8 per cent to 0.1 per cent in 2015. However, survey data omits the 1.3 million homeless children. Unlike prior literature’s focus on single motherhood, citizenship status is more consequential to extreme poverty. We also demonstrate that increases in SNAP generosity and take-up enabled declines in three measures of extreme child poverty
Maria Forslund, “The state of dying. Mortality in a comparative perspective – the interplay between cash and care”
There is an extensive body of research on the welfare state, yet the study of health outcomes and their association with social policy is a relatively new topic, particularly in comparative research. Comparative welfare state research has mostly focused on cash benefits, and comparative studies on health and the welfare state mostly consider the organization and function of the health care systems. Thus the interplay between cash and care in areas of sickness and health is in urgent need of more research. The purpose of this paper is to analyze how cash and care combines and produce different health outcomes in affluent countries. Focus is on all cause and cause specific mortality outcomes of health care systems and sickness cash benefits. Is the health impact of health care systems mediated by the organization of sickness cash benefits? By combining OECD health data and SPIN-data on sickness cash benefits I estimate a series of fixed effects structural equations. The results indicate that there is an interplay between cash and care of relevance for mortality outcomes. The mortality reducing effect of health care is stronger in countries where sickness cash benefits are more inclusive and generous. In the paper I discuss a few tentative pathways whereby sickness cash benefits influence performance of health care systems.
Rod Hick, The coupling of disadvantages: Material poverty and multiple deprivation in Europe before and after the crisis”
This paper examines the impact of the Great Recession on material poverty and multiple deprivation in Europe. Employing the Alkire-Foster adjusted headcount measure, we present a multidimensional poverty analysis of twenty-four EU Member States at four time points: 2005, 2008, 2011 and 2013, drawing on data from the EU Survey of Income and Living Conditions. The analysis shows that the pre-crisis period was associated with substantial reductions in multidimensional poverty in Europe, with the largest reductions in the poorest Member States. However, the Southern European countries largely failed to benefit from these pre-crisis poverty reductions and experienced the largest increases in multidimensional poverty in Europe when the crisis hit. These patterns reflect a changing geography of poverty in Europe, increasingly away from the East and towards the South.
Tim Goedemé, Bérénice Storms, Sara Stockman, Tess Penne, and Karel Van den Bosch, TOWARDS CROSS-COUNTRY COMPARABLE REFERENCE BUDGETS IN EUROPE: FIRST RESULTS OF A CONCERTED EFFORT
In Europe, reference budgets are increasingly recognised as a helpful tool for policy making and monitoring. If developed in a cross-country comparable way, reference budgets could in addition prove to be useful for cross-national learning and contextualising the EU social indicators. However, current reference budgets are not comparable across countries. In this paper we report on the first results of a concerted effort to construct comparable reference budgets for adequate social participation in Antwerp, Athens, Barcelona, Budapest, Helsinki and Milan. We start from a single theoretical and methodological framework and track carefully differences in institutional settings, climate, culture, availability and prices of goods and services that justify cross-country variations in contents and levels of reference budgets. Results indicate that adequate social participation requires access to different goods and services in the six cities, but that at the same time the needs to be fulfilled are rather similar, such that the variation in the level of reference budgets is less than what would be expected on the basis of differences in median household incomes. Results also show that constructing comparable reference budgets requires substantial and intensive coordination. We suggest directions in which our approach could be improved.
Keywords: reference budgets, minimum income, budget standard, social participation, adequacy, comparability
Qin Gao & Johanna Rickne, Firm Ownership and Social Insurance Inequality in China
China’s social insurance scheme has undergone drastic changes during the past 30 years, especially in the urban area. These reforms have focused on shifting the financing burden of the social insurance programs from state-owned and collective enterprises to shared responsibilities among employers, employees, and the state. Benefits enjoyed by urban residents have increased as compared to the pre-reform era. For example, Gao and Riskin (2009) found that the share of social insurance income in total household income for all urban households on average increased from 6% in 1988 to 10% in 1995 and to 14% in 2002.
However, the current social insurance system in urban China is characterized by huge inequality in program participation and benefit generosity, especially across employer ownership sectors. In 2007, 78% of the large and medium size state-owned enterprises participated in pensions or medical insurances as compared to 61% in collective enterprises, 79% in foreign-owned firms, and 55% in private domestic enterprises. Results from a survey conducted among youths taking the national civil servant exam showed that nearly 85% of the study participants believed that working in government institutions was the best occupation choice because of the generous social insurance benefits associated with such jobs (China Youth Daily, 2006).
In this paper, we examine inequality in social insurance participation and benefit generosity across various employer ownership sectors. We first provide a brief description of the recent and dramatic overhaul of the social insurance programs for urban residents. Then we move to analyze a large panel of firm data that include expenditures for the major insurance programs: pensions and medical insurance, unemployment insurance, and the housing accumulation fund. The data are drawn from annual accounting reports collected by the National Bureau of Statistics during 2000-2007. The sample includes all manufacturing firms with state ownership and all other industrial firms with annual sales above the threshold of five million RMB (about $650,000). To tease out the mechanisms whereby ownership can affect social insurance participation and benefit generosity, we also draw upon comprehensive information on other firm characteristics, including firm size, technology level, education level of employees, unionization, profitability, and region.
Descriptive results and baseline estimations show that state-owned firms are most likely to participate in the social insurance programs, foreign-owned and collective firms are less
likely to participate, and the lowest participation rates are found in private domestic firms. We explore three explanations for this pattern. First, whether the institutional proximity to the government among state-controlled firms, and the proximity to the international market in the foreign-owned sector, can explain the higher participation rates found among state-owned, collective, and foreign-owned firms. Second, whether worker characteristics drive firm participation. We hypothesize that firms with high-educated workers are more likely to provide insurance to reduce turnover costs. Third, we examine the role of labor intensity. Labor intensive firms in the private sector often have lower profitability and wages, which decreases the financial margins available for insurance provision. Our preliminary analyses provide supportive evidence to all three explanations.
Wim Van Lancker, Is a child-centred investment strategy bound to fail? Evidence for the EU 27
Under the social investment paradigm, a child-centred investment strategy has been developed. Mainstay of such strategy is the provision of childcare services, which are expected to increase maternal employment rates, further children’s human capital and mitigate social inequalities in early life. In this article, I critically assess the child-centred investment strategy and explore whether childcare services in European countries in their current state of affairs are up to the task of producing the anticipated benefits. The argument I develop is fairly simple: in order to be effective, childcare services 1) should be used at the highest possible level, and 2) the use should be equally distributed among social groups. Drawing on recent EU-SILC data I show that in all but two countries these conditions are not met: childcare is often used at low or moderate levels, and children from low-income families participate to a much lesser extent than children from high-income families. In order to overcome these childcare deficits, countries should pursue a consistent investment strategy which entails increasing childcare supply and increasing employment opportunities for all social groups. This will require huge budgetary efforts which might not be conceivable for most member states.
D. de Vaus, M. Gray, L. Qu and D. Stanton The economic of divorce and implications for the Australian social protection system
One of the major social changes in virtually all, if not all, OECD countries has been an increase in rates of relationship breakdown (divorce) and a rise in single parent families. Relationship breakdown often has negative economic effects and has become an important risk, particularly for women. A key role for social protection systems has thus increasingly become ameliorating some of the negative economic consequences of relationship breakdown.
The economic effects of relationship can be long-lasting with previous work by the authors of this paper having found that these impacts can last into later life. The long-term economic impacts of relationship breakdown and associated increases in the cost of the income support system will become increasingly significant to governments given the structural ageing of the population in OECD countries and the fact that many of those now reaching retirement age have experienced divorce earlier in their lives.
The article extends earlier work using ten waves of the data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey to estimate the short and longer term economic impacts of divorce, re-partnering and the consequences for the social protection system at different stages of the life course. The article also explores both the short and longer-term impacts of relationship breakdown on workforce participation.
A. Sölvi Kristjánsson, Income Redistribution in Iceland : Development and European Comparisons
This article explores income redistribution in Iceland stemming from taxes and transfers, both in terms of its development (1995–2009) and in comparison with European countries (2007). This is done by applying various decomposition analyses, mostly based on the reduction in the Gini coefficient due to taxes and transfers. Our results show that redistribution declined substantially in Iceland between 1995 and 2007; two thirds of the reduction was due to the tax system. The reduction in tax redistribution is explained by a decrease in the personal tax allowance and changed income composition. In a comparison of western European countries in 2007, redistribution stemming from taxes and transfers was lowest in Iceland. This may be explained by low progressivity in the tax system and very low transfer payments, which may to a large extent be explained by high employment rates. In an international comparison, Scandinavian and Continental European countries have the highest levels of redistribution. For the Continental countries, this is to a large extent due to low employment rates, while in the Scandinavian countries it is due to high